Questioning AIDS

Go Back   Questioning AIDS > AME Forum Archives > [archive] General

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 30th, 2007, 06:54 AM
msn_sally50010 msn_sally50010 is offline
Archived User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 145
msn_sally50010 is on a distinguished road
Default Critics Say Too Much Money Spent on AIDS Compared to Other Diseases (ame-g3445)

Critics Say Too Much Money Spent on AIDS Compared to Other Diseases

A grassroots movement to pressure Congress to base funding for disease research on mortality rates would sharply reduce levels of public funds spent for AIDS research and treatment.

One method of comparing research funding for various diseases is to calculate how much money is spent for every death caused by each disease.

The number of deaths has fallen from a high of 50,260 in 1995 to 15,245 in 2001. Despite the dramatic decline in deaths, funding for AIDS research and treatment has skyrocketed-largely as a result of successful lobbying by AIDS advocacy organizations.

Dr. Richard Darling, a California dentist who is spearheading the movement, calls it "grossly unfair" that money spent on AIDS exceeds the amount spent on illnesses such as heart disease, which kills more than 700,000 annually. "The entire allocation system is outrageously biased towards AIDS," said Dr. Darling. "The system is extremely unfair to heart disease, liver disease, diabetes, breast cancer, prostate disease, Alzheimer s and leukemia."

The National Institutes of Health will spend $2.5 billion for AIDS research this year, compared with $1.9 billion for cardiovascular diseases. Other diseases that receive far few research dollars include:

* Cancer: The second leading cause of death in the United States, 549,838 people died of cancer in 1999. NIH is funding the National Cancer Institute at an estimated $4.2 billion in 2002-or $7,713 for each death from cancer.

* Breast Cancer: With 180,000 new cases each year, breast cancer is the leading cause of death among American women who are 40-55 years of age. Each year about 46,000 women die of the disease. The NIH is currently spending $396 million on breast cancer research-or $8,608 per death from the disease.

* Diabetes: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 7 million Americans have diabetes-the sixth leading cause of death in the United States. In 1999 64,751 people died from complications associated with diabetes. The NIH has budgeted $450 million for diabetes research-or $6,949 per death from diabetes.

Despite the fact that since 1998 AIDS has not been on the list of the top 15 causes of death in America, the current NIH AIDS research budget amounts to an astounding $164,000 per AIDS death. This figure does not include the public monies spent to treat AIDS through the federal Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources (CARE) Act. Funding for CARE is currently $1.8 billion.

The imbalance in funding for research is particularly striking in light of the fact that the primary risk factors for contracting AIDS are voluntary behaviors that are already well known. In the United States, a majority of AIDS cases result from men having sex with men or from illegal use of intravenous drugs.

Rep. Ernest Istook (R-Okla.) recently voiced support for Dr. Darling s concerns: "If you have the politically correct disease, the prospect of getting federal funding to help find the cure are 100 times greater than if you have some other disease, even though it may be much more common."
  #2  
Old March 31st, 2007, 03:19 AM
msn_Moonchild493 msn_Moonchild493 is offline
Archived User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 363
msn_Moonchild493 is on a distinguished road
Default Critics Say Too Much Money Spent on AIDS Compared to Other Diseases (ame-g3445)

Dr. Darling deserves a lot of credit for voicing what is sure to be an unpopular view among many. It is obviously frustrating to AIDS researchers that they are making no progress, so they are determined to keep throwing more and more money at the problem.

Personally, I don t think they re accomplishing much regarding cancer, either. Until we get over this slash, burn and poison barbarity and accept that lifestyle issues are involved and we need to change our ways, I don t see much hope. Our world has become so toxic that we need to be extra vigilant about what we eat, drink and breathe. We need to stop trusting that mega-corporations have our best interests at heart. Hah! It s amazing how blind we can be.

So, while I agree that the allocations need to be adjusted according to need, there is so much more to look at than just that. We need to figure out why so many people are getting sick from diseases that barely existed 50-100 years ago. Why can t we see what s right in front of our faces? Could it be that there s no money in it?

Linda
  #3  
Old March 31st, 2007, 04:30 PM
msn_Douglas msn_Douglas is offline
Archived User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 38
msn_Douglas is on a distinguished road
Default Critics Say Too Much Money Spent on AIDS Compared to Other Diseases (ame-g3445)

Linda,
 
I could not agree with you more.
 
This is the second time I ve seen this article and both times without its source.  I have a problem when reading any article that doesn t show the original source (not that it was intentionally done).  I would just like to know where this came from.  And in checking it out, I found it is from a new organization with their own web site, apparently with their own agenda.
 
 
 
  #4  
Old April 1st, 2007, 05:15 AM
msn_satyagrahamonkey msn_satyagrahamonkey is offline
Archived User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 349
msn_satyagrahamonkey is on a distinguished road
Default Critics Say Too Much Money Spent on AIDS Compared to Other Diseases (ame-g3445)

According to the Kaiser Family Foundation,

"In FY 2005, U.S. federal funding for HIV/AIDS is estimated to total $19.7 billion. Of this, 59% will go to care, 15% to esearch, 9% to cash and housing assistance, 4% to prevention, and 12% to combat the international epidemic."

http://www.kff.org/hivaids/upload/Fact-Sheet-The-HIV-AIDS-Epidemic-in-the-United-States-2005-Update.pdf

That would be more than one million dollars per death.

 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there money in HIV/AIDS? consumerismsux General Discussion of HIV/AIDS 4 September 4th, 2012 07:54 PM
Neglected Tropical Diseases - The killer diseases of Africa's poor moonbird In the News - Published HIV/AIDS Stories 1 April 5th, 2010 03:49 PM
List of Aids Critics Books (ame-g3562) msn_hweb_3 [archive] General 0 May 26th, 2007 05:52 PM
April 23rd-AIDS CRITICS DAY (ame-a179) msn_aidsmythexposed-dot-com [archive] Activism 0 April 23rd, 2005 06:18 AM
aids critics keywords (ame-g1911) msn_hweb_3 [archive] General 1 April 23rd, 2005 04:53 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All contents copyrighted by QA 2000-2013