View Full Version : Bill Gates Confirms his "Love" for Vaccines

December 24th, 2010, 05:04 AM
Gates is stating that he considers vaccines to be useful in contributing to bring the projected population growth of 2.2 billion down to 1.3 billion, roughly one billion. What kind of properties can thus reasonably be deduced that vaccines are to have according to Gates? Well, basically all the properties that impede people to either have children, or successfully rear them. In other words, Gates implicitly advocates the definition of his favorite kind of vaccine to be one that fosters infertility, sterility and (early onset) senility (autism) alike. Note that Gates does not mention a word on the much touted purported intention of vaccines: to offer protection against relevant diseases and therefore as such, precisely prolong life. Here's the whole talk at 29 mins 33 secs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaF-fq2Zn7I


G Man
December 24th, 2010, 04:05 PM
Pretty amazing, isn't it?

And if you don't agree to take the vaccines, just maybe they will just force it on you so you don't have a choice: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcCnwPhGZOY

Got no love for Bill Gates or his 'foundation'.

December 25th, 2010, 07:13 PM
Don't get me started on Bill Gates.

Then again, it's not nearly as hard to get me started as it is to get me to stop. :D

I find it rather interesting that Bill Gates stepped down as CEO of Microsoft in January 2000, to devote his time to his new enterprise, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Here's why I find it so interesting:

First of all, remember the "internet bubble"? I've got news -- it never was an "internet bubble"; it was a "Y2K bubble". The internet is still going strong, 10 years after the so-called "internet bubble" burst. Hell, I only wish I'd gotten in on Google's (http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/google-inc/goog/nas) IPO six years ago -- if I had, my daughter would be well on her way to being a wealthy heiress by now.

What happened was that in 1998 and 1999 there was a lot of panic purchasing of software and hardware upgrades because everyone was scared shitless of the Y2K bug (and guess who was in the driver's seat of the whole panic.) This resulted in skyrocketing earnings in the software sector -- particularly in the last two quarters of 1999, which in turn caused Wall Street's formulas to begin to spit out unrealistic earnings projections. These pie-in-the-sky projections, in turn, resulted in a massive buying spree in the tech sector of the stock market.

Examine the following NASDAQ chart:


Note how the graph curves upwards as Y2K Day approaches, and how the increase accelerates as the date approaches. Then, after March 2000, the NASDAQ suddenly fell. Note, in particular, the dip in the 3rd quarter of 2001 -- that was the September 11 attacks. And yet, against the overall backdrop of the fall in stock prices since March 2000, the massive collapse in stock prices associated with the 9-11 attacks looks like a minor hiccup. THAT's how much the stock market fell between March 2000 and October 2002 -- by comparison, the 9-11 tumble was a drop in the bucket.

Now, by this point I'm sure you might have noticed that the graph continues to rise throughout the first quarter of 2000, and you may be asking, "If it was a Y2K bubble as you claim, then shouldn't the market have fallen immediately after Y2K Day?"

The answer is no, and here's why: Wall Street takes its cues from quarterly financial statements known as "SEC filings (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEC_filings)" which take place at the end of every quarter. Thus, while the earnings in the tech sector evaporated on January 1, Wall Street didn't find out about it until the end of March. As you can plainly see by the chart, when the earnings reports were published in March, the news wasn't good and a panic ensued.

Now, it is a common misconception that when the markets crash, everyone loses money. Nothing could be further from the truth. The stock market is more or less a zero-sum game. Wealth is neither created nor destroyed in the market; it merely changes hands. Thus, in a market panic, the vast majority of investors lose their shirts, but a savvy few make more money in a single day than most investors make in their entire careers. For every thousand investors who lose $1000 each in the panic, one guy makes a cool million in a single day.

Bill Gates was NOT one of the losers in this panic. Indeed, Forbes continued to list him as the world's wealthiest man every single year until 2007. So Bill Gates walked away with a gold mine, while everyone else got the shaft.

In January 2000, when the earnings evaporated, one man was in a unique position to capitalize on the collapse of the Y2K bubble, with a 3-month head start on the rest of the world: William H. Gates III. As the CEO of Microsoft, he knew the score. He knew that the earnings had dried up, and he quickly stepped down from his post at Microsoft before the end of the month, leaving everyone else to get killed in the market while he switched scams from the Y2K scam to the AIDS/philanthropy scam.

...See why I find the timing of his resignation as CEO of Microsoft so interesting?


John Bleau
December 25th, 2010, 08:45 PM
Interesting. Even more interesting would be the movements in his stock holdings during that period as that's what determines his wealth more than his position as CEO of Microsoft.

December 26th, 2010, 07:55 PM
Interesting. Even more interesting would be the movements in his stock holdings during that period as that's what determines his wealth more than his position as CEO of Microsoft.

Since 2000, Gates has invested heavily in pharmaceutical stocks, and the BMGF has come under fire (http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0823-26.htm) repeatedly for its pharma holdings (http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/ivaningrilli/2003/09/22/bill_gates_and_big_pharma.htm), and for preaching "ARV access for all" while at the same time fighting for what are called "TRIP" rights (http://www.bigeye.com/billgates.htm) (Trade-Related Intellectual Property), to prevent the manufacture and distribution of generic ARVs and other medications in the third world.

Gates was also fined $800,000 by the Justice Department (http://money.cnn.com/2004/05/03/technology/gates_penalty/) in 2004, for irregularities in his acquisition of more than $50 million worth of voting shares in a pharmaceutical company.


Worker Bee
December 26th, 2010, 11:05 PM
This was originally posted to a previous thread (http://forums.questioningaids.com/showpost.php?p=46745&postcount=11), but seems even more appropriate here.

Interviewing Thomas C. Mountain, Max Keiser had a very interesting discussion about the Bill Gates Foundation's vaccine scam in Africa (http://www.countercurrents.org/mountain220210.htm). Mountain states that the World Health Organization (WHO) in Africa is essentially a front for the major pharmaceutical corporations and that the WHO has suppressed news about a major breakthrough in Malaria mortality in Eritrea because the effort is based in public heath policies, not pharmaceutical based.

The discussion starts at 6:20 in this YouTube video:


The video is the second of three segments in the Keiser/Mountain interview. All three segments are on Keiser's site (http://maxkeiser.com/2010/12/19/on-the-edge-with-max-kaiser-latest-on-global-finance).

John Bleau
December 29th, 2010, 04:11 AM
Gos, thanks for the links.

January 9th, 2011, 11:01 PM
In June 2000, a group of top government scientists and health officials gathered for a meeting at the isolated Simpsonwood conference center in Norcross, Georgia. Convened by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the meeting was held at this Methodist retreat center, nestled in wooded farmland next to the Chattahoochee River, to ensure complete secrecy. The agency had issued no public announcement of the session -- only private invitations to fifty-two attendees. There were high-level officials from the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the top vaccine specialist from the World Health Organization in Geneva and representatives of every major vaccine manufacturer, including GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Wyeth and Aventis Pasteur. All of the scientific data under discussion, CDC officials repeatedly reminded the participants, was strictly "embargoed." There would be no making photocopies of documents, no taking papers with them when they left.

The federal officials and industry representatives had assembled to discuss a disturbing new study that raised alarming questions about the safety of a host of common childhood vaccines administered to infants and young children. According to a CDC epidemiologist named Tom Verstraeten, who had analyzed the agency's massive database containing the medical records of 100,000 children, a mercury-based preservative in the vaccines -- thimerosal -- appeared to be responsible for a dramatic increase in autism and a host of other neurological disorders among children. "I was actually stunned by what I saw," Verstraeten told those assembled at Simpsonwood, citing the staggering number of earlier studies that indicate a link between thimerosal and speech delays, attention-deficit disorder, hyperactivity and autism. Since 1991, when the CDC and the FDA had recommended that three additional vaccines laced with the preservative be given to extremely young infants -- in one case, within hours of birth -- the estimated number of cases of autism had increased fifteenfold, from one in every 2,500 children to one in 166 children.


Vaccine Exemption Information


November 3rd, 2011, 09:48 PM
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a front for a foreign aid theft ring that sells AIDS drugs to Africa, and other impoverished nations. Find out how this fake charity steals $ billions of dollars in foreign aid, and how their evil business modle insures a booming growth rate of aids and profits for decades to come.

I realize folks don't take Wikipedia seriously as if citing Reader's Digest but what you are about to hear, is it so far fetched?

I love this guys passion!


February 16th, 2012, 04:57 PM
The Health Ranger shares and gives commentary on a revealing Bill Gates interview with ABC News in which Gates claims GMO testing should follow examples set by corrupt pharmaceutical industry.

Other topics included:

* Posionous GMOs now being deceptively referred to as "high-tech agriculture"
* Gates continues to prove his support of depopulation through vaccines and GMOs


We live in a world of a lot of talk where very little is said.

February 19th, 2012, 01:07 AM

in 1.24 you might see the "reward" for Gates' contribution to the inhabitants of our planet. Such ungratitude!!!:D
It is about the story of yoghurt. It is not only good for the gut...

February 19th, 2012, 01:10 PM
You might, as well, have heard of the theory of "the food as a weapon", which was expressed by the fellow antichrist of Bill Gates, Dr Henry Kissinger..

Well the response to them might be