brianozz
April 10th, 2009, 03:11 AM
Interesting article from our local rag ...
Pell backs Pope on condom stance | theage.com.au (http://www.theage.com.au/national/pell-backs-pope-on-condom-stance-20090410-a2i3.html)
Cardinal Pell speaking:
"He made the point that the people in remote areas are too poor to afford condoms and the ones that are available are often of very poor quality and weren't used effectively," he said.
Cardinal Pell compared the AIDS infection rate in Catholic Philippines with that of Thailand which, he said, was struggling to cope with an epidemic of the disease.
"If you look at the Philippines you'll see the incidence of AIDS is much lower than it is in Thailand which is awash with condoms," he said.
"There are condoms everywhere and the rate of infection is enormous.
"That's what the Pope is talking about."
This could be taken to say that condoms encourage promiscuity (the way the article went).
However it could also be taken as meaning that condoms don't affect transmission because "HIV" doesn't follow the normal paths of infection. Possibly because most of the positive results aren't actually infection, they're from false positive results which are already higher in asian populations (and where people's immune systems are already suffering due to parasites and starvation).
Anyway ... an interesting report!!
Pell backs Pope on condom stance | theage.com.au (http://www.theage.com.au/national/pell-backs-pope-on-condom-stance-20090410-a2i3.html)
Cardinal Pell speaking:
"He made the point that the people in remote areas are too poor to afford condoms and the ones that are available are often of very poor quality and weren't used effectively," he said.
Cardinal Pell compared the AIDS infection rate in Catholic Philippines with that of Thailand which, he said, was struggling to cope with an epidemic of the disease.
"If you look at the Philippines you'll see the incidence of AIDS is much lower than it is in Thailand which is awash with condoms," he said.
"There are condoms everywhere and the rate of infection is enormous.
"That's what the Pope is talking about."
This could be taken to say that condoms encourage promiscuity (the way the article went).
However it could also be taken as meaning that condoms don't affect transmission because "HIV" doesn't follow the normal paths of infection. Possibly because most of the positive results aren't actually infection, they're from false positive results which are already higher in asian populations (and where people's immune systems are already suffering due to parasites and starvation).
Anyway ... an interesting report!!